January 2026 – A gentleman with opinions

nuTSR declares BANKRUPTCY!

So, at this point in the saga, the situation was:

Justin LaNasa (LaNasa) had taken out multiple lapsed trademarks, and was claiming his new company TSR LLC was the divine heir to them, and was now having to throw money into a bottomless pit due to having taken Wizards of the Coast to court over it.¹

This was, not sustainable given that is its products were generally bad and it’s convention failed to generate any buzz for obvious reasons. 16 months in, Justin had clearly noticed it wasn’t going great – hence the numerous meltdowns.²

So naturally, in May of 2023, he decided TSR LLC should just go bankrupt, and it was very funny. Yes, normally bankruptcies are tragic and heart breaking but this one was very funny. Bankruptcy was filed for on 8 June 2023.³

The first area of hilarity was Stephen Erin Dinehart IV, (Dinehart) of GiantLands infamy, immediately jumped into try to blame Wizards of the Coast for nuTSR putting themselves into bankruptcy.⁴

It should be noted that the courts never had to decide who owned TSR, but the answer is Wizards of the Coast, a subsidiary (not a Doing Business As) of Hasbro.

LaNasa himself chose to amplify this message, but decided to make no effort in doing so – leaving it open to speculation if he’d agreed with Dinehart – a man who he’d previous branded a traitor and put on his haters list – should basically resume his old job as nuTSR’s public relations.

A screenshot of Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum re-sharing the post by Wonderfilled.

TSR original Tim Kask had a much less sympathetic response to it.⁵

A text on image post by Tim Kask, 16 June 2023, "NuTSR bankrupt? Oh my, waht is the world coming to? Ah, it's senses. Big surprise when you are headed by a slimeball."

Rest in peace Tim, you were rough around the edges but you were an entertaining man of integrity right until the very end.

1
TSR LLC v. Wizards of the Coast LLC, 2:21-cv-01705, (W.D. Wash.)
2
Kim Wincen “Dungeon Crawl, TSR Cons & Meltdowns” (9 January 2026) A gentleman with opinions <blog.wincenworks.com>
3
TSR, LLC, 23-01577, (Bankr. E.D.N.C.)
4
Stephen Erin Dinehart IV (8 June 2023) Wonderfilled Facebook <now deleted>
5
Tim Kask (Kaskoid) (16 June 2023) Facebook <www.facebook.com/tim.kask.9>

I (re)played: Splinter Cell: Conviction

Released in 2010 as a kind of disruptive reinvention of the Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell games (collectively Splinter Cell), my relationship with this title was largely always in comparison to Hitman games. The era of gaming was one where many properties that were shifting from a slow, clunky engagement to faster, smoother and more intuitive approaches to gameplay.

While extremely polarizing at the time, Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell: Conviction (Conviction) has largely been forgotten – not even getting mentioned when people bring out their nostalgia for Tom Clancy’s Splinter Cell: Chaos Theory (Chaos Theory). It is, however, oddly relevant to the politics of today.

So, in my opinion, it’s also an interesting case where Capital-G Gamers were right that a game was bad… but they got the explanations backwards wrong. That’s, interesting but a lot to unpack.

I played: Last Message

This¹ free walking simulator that takes, generously an hour to play properly, is many things. It is a exploration into the experience of a non-heroic survivor in a zombie apocalypse, a meditation on the anxiety of the aftermath of the world’s mediocre response to Covid-19 pandemic, and a fantastic example of how walking simulators can offer amazing immersion in a role.

As its only a short game with a very linear story, I’m not going to go into the plot or characters – I’m instead going to recommend you play it yourself (it’s free, its a small install and a short play). Rather I wanted to put in the context of a conversation I saw a friend having about being over traditional Computer Role-Playing Games,² and how it ties to Robert Yang’s thoughts on the recurring deaths of immersive sims.³

1
James Veugelers Last Message (25 June 2021) JamesGamesNZ on Steam <store.steampowered.com/app/1141030/Last_Message/>
2
Duke Revier (3 January 2026) BlueSky <bsky.app/profile/dukerevier.bsky.social>
3
Robert Yang “The second death of the immersive sim (2007-2017) and a dark prophecy for a third-wave immersive sim” (12 October 2017) Radiator Blog <www.blog.radiator.debacle.us>

Dungeon Crawl, TSR Cons & Meltdowns

It’s tricky to talk about the other antics that nuTSR got up to directly afterwards, because I don’t have access to the primary sources. I didn’t get access to a copy of Dungeon Crawl, I didn’t got to TSR Con (I’ve never even been to Wisconsin).

But, they were products of TSR LLC and well, they’re more interesting to talk about that the weird rebinds of classic books that they had made,

A collection of 5 generic hardback rebinds of 1st Edition D&D books - the are gold on black, looking very generic with the only flare being the inclusion of the TSR Game Wizards trademark.

These were not a terrible idea but:

Featured the infringing trademark (as well as typos); and
Only available by “making a pilgrimage” to the Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum (and hoping that it happened to be open on that day); and
Were massively overvalued by the shop who wanted $650 US a piece for them¹

Now, just to be clear – it is perfectly legal to rebind old books and sell them in the USA, it’s called the First Sale Doctrine. Ordinarily, including the trademark of the original publisher would also be mostly viable. It is not, however a good idea to do this while also trying to pass yourself off as the owner of said trademark, and the divine heir to all its good will.

To the best of my knowledge they never sold a single one of these.

1
Justin LaNasa as Dungeon Hobby Shop Museum (29 March 2022) Facebook <www.facebook.com/RPGANONYMOUS> 📸

Vale Peggy

You were such a sweet mouse, always so social with Kathy and I, and so kind to the other mice (even when Daisy bullied you). You will be missed.