That’s right, I’m part of this story now.
This one technically started after the on case against Tenkar,1 Lanasa v. Stiene, 1:22-cv-05686, (E.D.N.Y) but was resolved quicker due to the appeal,2 Lanasa v. Stiene, 24-1325, (2d Cir.) so I’m covering it first. We’re on the home stretch, I promise you.
Back on 10 March 2023, I was contacted over Facebook, then phone, by NetSafe to let me know that Justin LaNasa (LaNasa) had lodged a complaint about me and they were following process as they were required to do.
On 30 January 2024, LaNasa filed his follow up with Netsafe, and it was immediately put before Judge P R Rzepecky made a decision on the papers to take no immediate action but to refer the matter to a NetSafe technician (as LaNasa indicated it might involve an order to a hosting service), and then proceed with a case management conference and a half-day hearing.
On 12 April 2024 my wife told me there was someone was here to see me, quite confused why someone wearing a stab proof vest with a notice that it was recording on bodycam was there to deliver a giant parcel of documents to me.
I accepted service from a confused bailiff, who was grateful that I understood what it was about. She had been tasked with serving me over 110 pages, and was mostly screenshots without context, with the front cover being written in Lower LaNasian and Netsafe’s summary buried in the documentation.
They say that a man who represents himself in court has a fool for a client, so with God as my witness I immediately made a declaration.
Now, I wasn’t a lawyer that the time I received this – but I was a law student so I treated this as a kind of unofficial extra credit job. So, in the spirit of making this a robust analysis, as would be expected of a law student, I’ll be using the CLEO method.
So, let’s talk about that time I got served by the courts over some blog posts and bunch of comments on Facebook (many of which I didn’t even make).
Continue reading LaNasa v Wincen (it me!)- 1Lanasa v. Stiene, 1:22-cv-05686, (E.D.N.Y)
- 2Lanasa v. Stiene, 24-1325, (2d Cir.)










